Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
P propertybaajaar
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Issues 1
    • Issues 1
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Fatima McGuinness
  • propertybaajaar
  • Issues
  • #1

Closed
Open
Created Jun 18, 2025 by Fatima McGuinness@fatimamcguinneMaintainer

Determining Fair Market Value Part I.


Determining fair market value (FMV) can be an intricate process, as it is extremely based on the specific realities and circumstances surrounding each appraisal project. Appraisers should exercise expert judgment, supported by reputable data and sound method, to identify FMV. This frequently needs cautious analysis of market trends, the schedule and dependability of equivalent sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would carry out under typical market conditions including a ready buyer and a ready seller.

This short article will attend to determining FMV for the meant usage of taking an income tax deduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being stated, this methodology applies to other designated uses. While Canada's meaning of FMV differs from that in the US, there are numerous resemblances that permit this general approach to be applied to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will address Canadian language particularly.

Fair market worth is defined in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as "the cost at which residential or commercial property would alter hands in between a ready purchaser and a ready seller, neither being under any obsession to buy or to sell and both having reasonable understanding of relevant truths." 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) expands upon this meaning with "the reasonable market value of a specific item of residential or commercial property ... is not to be identified by a forced sale. Nor is the reasonable market worth of an item to be identified by the list price of the product in a market other than that in which such item is most typically offered to the public, taking into account the location of the product anywhere appropriate."

The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there must be no difference in between the definition of fair market value for different tax usages and for that reason the combined definition can be used in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the finest starting point for guidance on figuring out reasonable market price. While federal policies can appear challenging, the existing variation (Rev. December 2024) is just 16 pages and utilizes clear headings to help you find key info rapidly. These concepts are also covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, starting at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, discovered at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, offers an essential and concise visual for identifying fair market value. It lists the following factors to consider presented as a hierarchy, with the most dependable indicators of identifying fair market worth listed first. In other words, the table is presented in a hierarchical order of the strongest arguments.

1. Cost or selling price 2. Sales of similar residential or commercial properties 3. Replacement cost 4. Opinions of expert appraisers

Let's check out each consideration separately:

1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer's expense or the real selling rate gotten by a qualified company (a company eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) may be the very best indication of FMV, specifically if the transaction happened close to the appraisal date under normal market conditions. This is most trustworthy when the sale was recent, at arm's length, both celebrations knew all appropriate truths, neither was under any compulsion, and market conditions remained steady. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) specifies "arm's length" as "a deal in between one celebration and an independent and unrelated celebration that is performed as if the two parties were strangers so that no dispute of interest exists."

This lines up with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which says the appraiser needs to supply enough to suggest they abided by the requirements of Standard 7 by "summing up the results of analyzing the subject residential or commercial property's sales and other transfers, agreements of sale, options, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was required for reputable task outcomes and if such details was available to the appraiser in the typical course of organization." Below, a remark additional states: "If such details is unobtainable, a declaration on the efforts carried out by the appraiser to acquire the information is required. If such details is unimportant, a declaration acknowledging the presence of the details and mentioning its lack of importance is required."

The appraiser should ask for the purchase cost, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors may hesitate to share this info, it is required in Part I of Form 8283 and also appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for items valued over $50,000. Whether the donor decreases to supply these details, or the appraiser figures out the info is not appropriate, this should be clearly documented in the appraisal report.

2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are one of the most trusted and commonly utilized approaches for determining FMV and are especially convincing to intended users. The strength of this technique depends upon numerous crucial factors:

Similarity: The closer the comparable is to the contributed residential or commercial property, the stronger the evidence. Adjustments need to be produced any differences in condition, quality, or other value appropriate attribute. Timing: Sales must be as close as possible to the evaluation date. If you use older sales information, first validate that market conditions have stayed stable which no more recent comparable sales are offered. Older sales can still be used, however you must change for any modifications in market conditions to show the existing worth of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale should be at arm's length in between notified, unpressured celebrations. Market Conditions: Sales must happen under typical market conditions and not during abnormally inflated or depressed durations.

To pick suitable comparables, it is necessary to completely understand the meaning of reasonable market worth (FMV). FMV is the price at which residential or commercial property would alter hands between a prepared purchaser and a ready seller, with neither celebration under pressure to act and both having reasonable understanding of the facts. This definition refers particularly to actual finished sales, not listings or quotes. Therefore, just sold outcomes ought to be utilized when determining FMV. Asking costs are simply aspirational and do not show a consummated transaction.

In order to pick the most typical market, the appraiser needs to consider a wider overview where equivalent previously owned products (i.e., secondary market) are offered to the public. This usually narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two distinct markets with different characteristics. It is necessary not to combine comparables from both, as doing so stops working to plainly recognize the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you should consider both markets and after that select the very best market and consist of comparables from that market.
petapixel.com
3. Replacement Cost: Replacement expense can be considered when identifying FMV, however just if there's a sensible connection between a product's replacement expense and its fair market price. Replacement expense describes what it would cost to replace the item on the appraisal date. In most cases, the replacement cost far goes beyond FMV and is not a trusted indication of value. This approach is utilized occasionally.

4. Opinions of expert appraisers: The IRS permits skilled opinions to be considered when identifying FMV, however the weight offered depends upon the expert's qualifications and how well the viewpoint is supported by facts. For the viewpoint to bring weight, it should be backed by reliable proof (i.e., market data). This method is utilized infrequently. Determining fair market price includes more than applying a definition-it needs thoughtful analysis, sound method, and trustworthy market data. By following IRS assistance and thinking about the realities and circumstances linked to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will even more check out these concepts through real-world applications and case examples.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking