GitLab

For Christmas I got an interesting present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, chessdatabase.science and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an .

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to expand his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative purposes must be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector bphomesteading.com needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and forum.altaycoins.com used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, visualchemy.gallery I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.